Skip to content

Research · 2026 to 2036

Tomorrow's founders, tested today.

How should founders and companies work with AI agents? Every summer we test it with 350 startup teams and count verified revenue, not opinions.

randomised teams a year
350
sites: London, Rome, Lisbon, Lausanne
4
revenue target in 30 days
$10K
revenue, not reported
Verified

HostsUC Berkeley · University of Lisbon · Bayes Business School · Carnegie Mellon University

PartnersMicrosoft Research · Google DeepMind · OpenAI · NVIDIA · Y Combinator · Antler · Hugging Face

2026 to 2036

Six questions for the next ten years

AI moved into startups and companies fast in 2025 and 2026. Here is what the latest data says, and the EIA study that tests each question.

  1. Solo founders

    Now

    36.3% of new startups on Carta had a single founder in the first half of 2025, up from 23.7% in 2019.

    Carta, Solo Founders Report 2025 (opens in a new tab)

    Open question

    Can one person with AI agents build what used to take a founding team?

    Course study
  2. Agents at work

    Now

    23% of companies say they are scaling an AI agent. Gartner expects over 40% of agentic AI projects to be cancelled by the end of 2027.

    McKinsey, The state of AI in 2025 (opens in a new tab) · Gartner, 25 June 2025 (opens in a new tab)

    Open question

    How much can a founder hand to agents while the money is real, and who stays in charge?

    Accelerator study
  3. Company adoption

    Now

    20% of EU companies with 10 or more staff used AI in 2025, up from 13.5% a year earlier.

    Eurostat, 11 December 2025 (opens in a new tab)

    Open question

    Where in a small company does AI pay back, and where does it only add cost?

    Finding: where AI sits
  4. Same ideas

    Now

    Stories written with one AI idea were 10.7% more alike than stories written without AI.

    Doshi & Hauser, Science Advances, 2024 (opens in a new tab)

    Open question

    If every founder asks the same models, where do new products come from?

    Novelty study
  5. Health AI

    Now

    Over 80% of US physicians now use AI at work, double the share in 2023.

    AMA, Physician Survey on AI, March 2026 (opens in a new tab)

    Open question

    Can a model test a health tech startup before the founder spends a year building it?

    World HealthTech Model
  6. First revenue

    Now

    20% of startups incorporated through Stripe Atlas charged their first customer within 30 days in 2025, up from 8% in 2020.

    Stripe, annual update, 24 February 2026 (opens in a new tab)

    Open question

    Can we tell before a company is founded whether it will send its first invoice within 30 days?

    FounderBench study

Six questions. One cohort.

One measure: verified revenue.

See the five studies

Five studies

One cohort, five questions

Every summer 350 teams start companies at EIA. Each study uses the same cohort and the same verified revenue.

In design

Course

When
Jul–Aug, 30 days
Sample
350 teams, randomised
Question
Can a founder-controlled agent system reach $10K revenue in 30 days, and which control setup keeps the founder in charge?
Design
350 teams, randomised in three strata. Solo (100): CEO plus product and GTM agents. Pair (200): CEO and CPO, AI as CMO, 2×2 oversight by self-improvement. Trio (50): human CMO owns GTM.
Endpoint
Verified revenue at day 30. Power d≈0.57 per 50-team arm.

Propose a research question

World HealthTech Model

A world model of how startups grow

Trained on real EIA cohorts and checked against their verified revenue. Health tech is the first field we are building it for.

Watch the model run a startup before the founder does.

How it works

  1. 01State encoderOpen LLM plus structured features
  2. 02Dynamics corePhysics-informed
  3. 03EvaluatorCalibrated on verified revenue
  4. 04Control policyWhen to ask the founder

Roadmap

  1. 2026Control layer and trace schema
  2. 2027World model v0.1 beats mentor scores
  3. 2028FounderSim reproduces the effect sizes
  4. 2029Planning agents beat agents without a model
  5. 2030Adopted by 5+ outside teams; 6+ peer-reviewed papers
Technical detail: subsystems and calibration data

Four subsystems

  • Demand

    Structure
    Diffusion ODEs, saturation, price elasticity
    Learned
    Neural ODE with residual loss
    Priors
    Product Hunt, Amazon Reviews, Census entry series
  • Product

    Structure
    Quality-adoption coupling; PDE feasibility for hardware
    Learned
    Neural operators, video world models
    Priors
    The Well, PDEBench, automotive CFD sets
  • Go-to-market

    Structure
    Funnel conservation, capacity queueing, channel saturation
    Learned
    Constrained sequence model
    Priors
    YC and Antler descriptions, Product Hunt metadata
  • Business

    Structure
    Cash conservation; MRR = acquisition minus churn
    Learned
    Hybrid grey-box model
    Priors
    Open Startups and Indie Hackers revenue series

Calibration data

firms in the Y Combinator directory (CC0)
5,404
firms in the Antler portfolio
~1,600
rows of PDL company data
32.3M
VCBench profiles
9,000
human choices in Psych-101
10M+
physics corpus in The Well
~15 TB

Findings

What the research says so far

Seven findings from the literature that the studies build on.

  1. 01

    Solo plus AI matches a team

    With AI access, solo founders match team outcomes.

  2. 02

    Value depends on where AI sits

    Teaching 515 startups where AI fits raised revenue 1.9× and cut capital needs 39.5%.

    • Kim, working paper
  3. 03
  4. 04

    Revenue is not a clean reward

    Self-improvement works on benchmarks, but evaluators must co-evolve to stop reward gaming.

    • Zhang, peer-reviewed
  5. 05

    Human control is untested with real money

    L1–L5 autonomy and oversight regimes are formalised, but never run with founders and live revenue.

  6. 06

    AI ideation homogenises

    New-to-the-world creation needs measurement and de-fixation.

    • Wenger & Kenett, "Large language models are homogeneously creative," PNAS Nexus 5(3)
  7. 07

    Physics can constrain business dynamics

    Neural operators embed governing equations; neuro-symbolic frameworks impose economic constraints.

Published from EIA cohorts

Earlier studies of EIA students.

  • Founding intent rose from 0% to 58% among students with no prior startup experience.

    Taggar, Domurath & Coviello, Academy of Management, 2019

  • Peer-driven learning raised entrepreneurial passion by 1.3 points on a 5-point scale.

    Taggar, Domurath & Coviello, 2024

  • Self-efficacy rose by 1.8 and resilience by 1.6 on a −3…+3 scale.

    Brandt, 2023

Join a study

Who are you?

Pick what you can bring. We reply within one business day.

Start the conversation

We only use this to reply about joint research. Privacy

Or write to research@inacademy.eu. Data requests: data@inacademy.eu. Ethics approvals on request.

Since 2013

A research partner with thirteen years of cohorts

The mission passes from cohort to cohort, like a torch. 25,000 carriers so far.

Photo credits

City photos: Wikimedia Commons contributors (CC BY / CC BY-SA), listed on the About page. The rest are EIA's own.

More about EIA

Get the Faculty Pack

New to EIA? Leave your work email and our university relations manager will send you the latest Faculty Pack: syllabus, learning outcomes, rubrics, contact hours, grant terms and the due-diligence checklist.

Already a partner university? Your EIA contact sends you the updated pack each year.

Privacy policy